ABSTRACT
Child maltreatment has detrimental social and health effects for individuals, families and communities. The ERICA project is a pan-European training programme that equips non-specialist threshold practitioners with knowledge and skills to prevent and detect child maltreatment. This paper describes and presents the findings of a rapid review of good practice examples across seven participating countries including local services, programmes and risk assessment tools used in the detection and prevention of child maltreatment in the family. Learning was applied to the development of the generic training project. A template for mapping the good practice examples was collaboratively developed by the seven participating partner countries. A descriptive data analysis was undertaken organised by an a priori analysis framework. Examples were organised into three areas: programmes tackling child abuse and neglect, local practices in assessment and referral, risk assessment tools. Key findings were identified using a thematic approach. Seventy-two good practice examples were identified and categorised according to area, subcategory and number. A typology was developed as follows: legislative frameworks, child health promotion programmes, national guidance on child maltreatment, local practice guidance, risk assessment tools, local support services, early intervention programmes, telephone or internet-based support services, COVID-19 related good practices. Improved integration of guidance into practice and professional training in child development were highlighted as overarching needs. The impact of COVID-19 on safeguarding issues was apparent. The ERICA training programme formally responded to the learning identified in this international good practice review.
ABSTRACT
Background: In March this year, most of the routine activities were cancelled during the streaming of the pandemic in Italy. This prompted a pragmatic reorganization of the traditional care model of nursing and medicine, to quickly give an efficient clinical response. During the first phase of the pandemic, outpatient visits dropped by more than 60%, forcefully shifting to telemedicine to assure continuity of care despite the lockdown. Objectives: The aim of the present work was to describe the strategy adopted during and immediately after the lockdown to assure the follow up of patients and the maintenance of their treatment in an outpatient “virtual” telemedicine clinic dedicated to RDs. Methods: the patient flow to a rheumatology division during the lockdown was evaluated retrospectively from March to September 2020 in accordance with local restrictions, and three periods are described. Results: 653/913 (71.5%), 542/542 (100%) and 1.048/1.048 (100%) infusion activities scheduled were performed at the centre for daily infusion and pre-infusion assessment, respectively during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd period. In the outpatient clinic during the 1st period, 96.96% of the cases was shifted to Telemedicine, which decreased to 52.45% in the 2nd period;while in the 3rd period, 97.6% of the performances were carried out at the clinic. Diagnostic procedures, such as ultrasound, capillaroscopy, and joint injection were generally postponed during the 1st period, reduced drastically during the 2nd and performed regularly during 3rd period. Ulcer treatment and the Clinical Trial Unit never stopped their activity. The flow of the activity of the outpatient clinic and the day hospital is represented as monthly trends in graph 1 (See Graph 1). Conclusion: Our data show the feasibility of Telemedicine in a lockdown condition. Shifting stable patients to Telemedicine has the potentiality to minimize the risk of contagion and allow continuity of care. In the future, the use of Telemedicine for specific clinical uses might assure patient assistance also in non-pandemic conditions. (Figure Presented).